There is little doubt among professionals who encounter custody and visitation cases, whether those professionals be judges, referees, lawyers, social workers or mediators, that the most qualified people to resolve these cases are the mother and father. Sometimes, however, the level of communication between the parties is less than ideal. At other times, one or both parties may not be entirely sure of what their legal rights and responsibilities are and therefore become reluctant to negotiate "in the dark." It is at times like these that an attorney and/or mediator can be of vital assistance in helping to bridge the gap between parties who are considering litigation.
At the very least mediation can help crystallize the issues that cannot be resolved without the need for litigation. Even this is a laudable goal since it will focus the scope of litigation and therefore reduce the time and expense. But more often, parents who have reasonable expectations can craft a workable plan without the need of litigation. This is usually ideal for both parties as it allows them to create a plan for parenting time that comports with their own schedules, rather than having a plan imposed on them by a third party stranger and then have to "make it work".
My advice to parents who are considering litigation is to take the time to meet with the other parent with the assistance of a qualified mediator. It is a small investment that will pay enormous financial, as well as emotional, dividends.
Showing posts with label mediation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mediation. Show all posts
Thursday, April 3, 2014
Saturday, September 18, 2010
Alternatives to Litigation
It goes without say that the person in the best position to make an informed decision about your life is you. This is true whether you're considering a career change, moving or getting a new car. So why, one has to wonder, do people entrust one of the most important decisions of their lives to total strangers?
Nonetheless, that is exactly what happens every time two parents refuse to resolve a case in Family Court and entrust the decision as to how their parenting time will be allocated amongst them. Unfortunately, and more times than not, the judges and referees empowered to make these decisions get it wrong. They do so not because of lack of intelligence or good intentions, but because of the natural constraints of time, they cannot possibly take into consideration all of the myriad variables that confront each person's life. The end result is often a patchwork that seeks to arbitrarily assign parents "time slots".
There are times, of course, when a resolution is impossible either because of one party's intractable insistence on unreasonable conditions, or because the parties have a good faith disagreement as to what is in their child's best interest that cannot be decided without the intervention of a neutral third party. These circumstances are rare, however, and most cases can be resolved provided that the parties are willing. However, this willingness to compromise on emotionally explosive issues is often in short supply.
It is for this reason that at the very outset of my representation of a client, during the initial consultation, the possibilities for an expedited resolution are always explored. This is not to suggest that a surrender is contemplated at the outset, but it is critical to organize a client's priorties and expectations in order to adequately represent them. It is equally critical to assess any realistic avenues of resolution to prevent not just the client, but the entire family, the expense, both financial and emotional, of protracted litigation. I have often found that the longer a case drags on the more likely it is that parties will become emotionally invested in the positions they have staked out for themselves. Time and money spent defending these positions is deemed wasted if they settle for anything less than everything they want.
Mediation, particularly at the outset of the case, is often a compelling alternative for clients and attorneys alike. It gives the parties a chance to air out their differences in an informal forum. This conversation can often, in and of itself, have a powerful ameliorative effect on the parties. It is one of the dirty little secrets that most divorce attorneys know that the easiest way to keep parties at war with each other (and paying their fees) is to keep them at arm's length, which is why many insist that all communications take place through the attorneys. It is a lot easier to be vindictive, insensitive and unreasonable when you do not have to look your former spouse/paramour in the eye. And because it is in the financial interests of the attorney to foster continued litigation rather than reach a resolution, the attorney and client will, whether they realize it or not, find themselves with conflicting objectives.
Mediation also has a practical implication for the attorneys, even if the case is not resolved. It enables the attorneys to narrow the issues confronting the parties considerably while simultaneously allowing them to evaluate the other party's credibility, demeanor and character. This information will prove invaluable at later junctures such as future settlement discussions and/or cross examinations. It will also help the attorneys to understand the other side of their own client's story and therefore gain a broader understanding of the needs of the family. Too often, attorneys approach their cases with tunnel vision, seeing only what their own client sees.
In short, litigation in Family Court is an arduous endeavor for anyone. But it particularly difficult for children who are emotionally ill-equipped to cope with the stressors that confront them in court. Moreover, the lingering uncertainty of where they will live, having to choose between two parents they love and being forced to divulge intimately personal information to a bevy of strangers is unnerving at best, catastrophically traumatic at worst.
As parents, it should be your first priority to try to determine, with or without the assistance of an attorney, how to resolve your family's crisis with a minimum of collateral damage. Settlements made by the parties themselves are almost always the best way to accomplish that.
Nonetheless, that is exactly what happens every time two parents refuse to resolve a case in Family Court and entrust the decision as to how their parenting time will be allocated amongst them. Unfortunately, and more times than not, the judges and referees empowered to make these decisions get it wrong. They do so not because of lack of intelligence or good intentions, but because of the natural constraints of time, they cannot possibly take into consideration all of the myriad variables that confront each person's life. The end result is often a patchwork that seeks to arbitrarily assign parents "time slots".
There are times, of course, when a resolution is impossible either because of one party's intractable insistence on unreasonable conditions, or because the parties have a good faith disagreement as to what is in their child's best interest that cannot be decided without the intervention of a neutral third party. These circumstances are rare, however, and most cases can be resolved provided that the parties are willing. However, this willingness to compromise on emotionally explosive issues is often in short supply.
It is for this reason that at the very outset of my representation of a client, during the initial consultation, the possibilities for an expedited resolution are always explored. This is not to suggest that a surrender is contemplated at the outset, but it is critical to organize a client's priorties and expectations in order to adequately represent them. It is equally critical to assess any realistic avenues of resolution to prevent not just the client, but the entire family, the expense, both financial and emotional, of protracted litigation. I have often found that the longer a case drags on the more likely it is that parties will become emotionally invested in the positions they have staked out for themselves. Time and money spent defending these positions is deemed wasted if they settle for anything less than everything they want.
Mediation, particularly at the outset of the case, is often a compelling alternative for clients and attorneys alike. It gives the parties a chance to air out their differences in an informal forum. This conversation can often, in and of itself, have a powerful ameliorative effect on the parties. It is one of the dirty little secrets that most divorce attorneys know that the easiest way to keep parties at war with each other (and paying their fees) is to keep them at arm's length, which is why many insist that all communications take place through the attorneys. It is a lot easier to be vindictive, insensitive and unreasonable when you do not have to look your former spouse/paramour in the eye. And because it is in the financial interests of the attorney to foster continued litigation rather than reach a resolution, the attorney and client will, whether they realize it or not, find themselves with conflicting objectives.
Mediation also has a practical implication for the attorneys, even if the case is not resolved. It enables the attorneys to narrow the issues confronting the parties considerably while simultaneously allowing them to evaluate the other party's credibility, demeanor and character. This information will prove invaluable at later junctures such as future settlement discussions and/or cross examinations. It will also help the attorneys to understand the other side of their own client's story and therefore gain a broader understanding of the needs of the family. Too often, attorneys approach their cases with tunnel vision, seeing only what their own client sees.
In short, litigation in Family Court is an arduous endeavor for anyone. But it particularly difficult for children who are emotionally ill-equipped to cope with the stressors that confront them in court. Moreover, the lingering uncertainty of where they will live, having to choose between two parents they love and being forced to divulge intimately personal information to a bevy of strangers is unnerving at best, catastrophically traumatic at worst.
As parents, it should be your first priority to try to determine, with or without the assistance of an attorney, how to resolve your family's crisis with a minimum of collateral damage. Settlements made by the parties themselves are almost always the best way to accomplish that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)